I was extremely fascinated by the only strong female character that is
mentioned maybe just two times in Joseph Conrad’s entire novel Heart of
Darkness.
He first depicts her from a crowd of native people, which
was code in my mind that she is important and I immediately began trying to put together a
story for her. After setting the scene he introduces her “along the lighted
shore moved a wild and gorgeous apparition of a woman.” Conrad seldom spoke of
woman and often it was derogatory and the main character somehow saw this woman
in a more positive light. It is as if he welcomes us to make up her role as the
story moves along.
I was immediately drawn to this woman, I wanted to know who
she was and what her part in the story was, but other than physical
descriptions Conrad leads us the readers to write his own novel or in other
words to have our own reader-response criticism.
Reader-response criticism is simply stated in
The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism as, “reading is
really a process of combining what is physically in print with what you make up
in your mind….texts never tell you absolutely everything, and when the author doesn’t give
you a particular detail, you may supply it yourself.”
I initially thought that this woman was the infamous Mr.
Kurtz’s “intended;” however, as we come to understand that he left a grieving
fiancé at home. Although I was wrong about the mysterious native woman being
his intended I still believe that they had a romantic relationship. It is written that she was more than upset at Mr. Kurtz sickly departure from the
African Congo. How empowering is it that we get to be somewhat of a writer in
such an amazing novel!
Then also from this same empowered woman that somehow
empowers our own thinking and mental writing we find paradox in who she is. “She
walked with measured steps.. treading the earth proudly… she carried her head
high” she seems to have it all together and to be perfectly balanced. However,
in the very next paragraph she seems to be falling apart, “Her face had a tragic
and fierce aspect of wild sorrow.” His description leaves us with the
impression that such a strong and controlled woman has no control at all, and
that is the wonder of deconstruction. This native woman becomes so much more
alive and real to us through the irony that she is both carrying her head high
but fiercely sorrowful. Conrad uses deconstruction to also allow us to be the
author alongside him, and for me it is proof of her love for Conrad.
You can also see more criticism for nameless native woman here.
My sister and I on a little trip to Mexico; trying to accessorize like the native woman.
"her hair was done in the shape of a helmet; she had brass leggings to the knee, brass wire gauntlets to the elbow , a crimson spot on her tawny cheek, innumerable necklaces of glass beads on her neck; bizarre things, charms , gifts of witch-men, that hung about her, glittered and trembled at every step."
I like how you focused more on the woman, even though she's hardly mentioned. I think it would be interesting to know the way that Conrad actually viewed women given the time period and everything. I think that one of the most interesting parts is the way that while he seems to give the women credit in the book, he still almost never mentions them.
ReplyDeleteI think that this was an excellent demonstration of Reader Response, and with just a dash of Deconstructionism thrown in. A great read!
ReplyDeleteI agree that Conrad seldom spoke of women, and spoke even less about women in a positive light. I wonder why he chose to talk about her in particular. Maybe he did so to contrast her with Kurtz...
ReplyDelete