In today’s ever-digitalized culture, people can learn a lot
about one another—hometown, favorite band, who the ex-boyfriend was, what sport
was played in high school—all without ever having spoken to each other. They make judgments about whether to hire
people for jobs or even ask them out on a date based on a common practice of our
time: Facebook stalking. It’s growing
ever clearer that we must take care to create a good image for ourselves both
on- and offline. In her article, “’Words
with Friends’: Socially Networked Reading on Goodreads,” Lisa Nakamura shows
how popular literary website Goodreads.com solidifies intellectual identities
by allowing users to create bookshelves, share favorite works, participate in
online discussions, review and recommend books to friends, and discover new
genres and authors.
Nakamura brings up a point that I definitely relate to. Of the online bookshelf feature, she says,
“Goodreads shelves remediate earlier reading cultures where books were
displayed in the home as signs of taste and status.” She’s right!
People can tell a lot about each other from the things what books are
read and kept in the home! For example,
I work as a nanny. Whenever I get an
interview with a potential family, I’m sure to sneak a glance at their
libraries when I get to the house. Many
times have I avoided an undesirable job after seeing stacks of titles like, The Official Guide to Dysfunctional
Parenting. No nanny wants into that
mess. But with cool sites like
Goodreads, we can create a more attractive side to ourselves. Want to be seen as a classy gal? Stock your shelves with Jane Austin,
Charlotte Bronte, Charles Dickens, all the fine ladies and gents of
literature. Looking to find a more
adventurous crowd? Read, rate, and
review things like Ender’s Game, The
Hobbit, or DaVinci Code. Choosing how to present yourself is one
of the fun and creative aspects that Goodreads has to offer.
But the fun doesn’t stop there! Nakamura shows how Goodreads seamlessly
incorporates other social media networks into its matrix so that users can both
make new friends AND show existing friends how well-read and fabulous they are!
“Goodreads, the largest social
network site “for readers,” with over six million users, does everything that Vinh
says digital- reading technologies need to do and more. It covers all the conventions
of social networking—an in- box, notifications, and a status ticker. Classified
as a social cataloging site, it links promiscuously to other social
networks—Facebook, Twitter, Gmail, Yahoo!, and Hotmail—and automatically
generates invitations to existing friends on these networks.”
By linking to existing networks, Goodreads has access to
audiences that are already socially active.
It doesn’t just generate content and hope that users will access and
share the site; it makes sharing both easy and desirable to create new
friendships and enhance old ones.
Friends can create forums, like online book clubs, and discuss and share
their ideas on literature. They can advertise readership of their favorite
popular or little-known books through interactive share buttons, links, and
other widgets. They can create lists and
groups that invite other people to join the conversation in ways that create
ties and relationships that last.
Goodreads is taking advantage of the technological wave
sweeping society. It is a place where
people can gather together and read, regardless of distance. Its potential for good is enormous, and will
surely play a key role in how we read in the future! With all of the great features available, we
can create a well-read, intelligent, and intriguing side to our digital
selves—and make sure that everyone knows it!
{the classy, intellectual, digital me.}
Your first sentence is what scares me so much about social media not that I have anything to hide, but that virtually everyone can see it.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I agree that Goodreads has a lot of good! I find it so interesting how we can judge someone so easily off their bookshelf.
I like that your point of our bookshelves showing who we are as a person. It does make me wonder how honest people are though. For example, it would be so easy to act like I've read a ton of books and write a bunch of reviews based on my sparknote reading of those books. We see dishonest people all the time on Facebook - posting extremely edited pictures or lying about their ages. Should there be a quiz when adding a book to our virtual bookshelves to find out if we've actually read a book? Probably not because it's not that important, but I do wonder if people will start using Goodreads to show themselves as experts in literature when they really aren't.
ReplyDelete