Reader Response: It could go this way or that way... perspective is everything.
New Historicism: What aspects of Shelby's life as an 8th grader would cause her to take such a picture?
Reader Response: This was meant to look like a snake, but you may see it as rather demonic.
In his classic novel, Heart
of Darkness, author Joseph Conrad starts off the story in a way that sets
the tone for the whole book. He sets up
the scene by having his narrator, Marlow, onboard a ship, staring off into the ocean
dramatically. He launches into a tale of
darkness and terrors of the jungles of the Congo, but somehow just as
informative as the story itself are the literary techniques that Conrad employs
to implicitly convey his message.
In the new historicist perspective, time and
space—chronotopes—are everything. New
historicists believe that authors use these tools to create a format that we,
the audience, generally associate with those certain ideas. For example, Conrad sets up the scene by
describing:
“The
sea-reach of the Thames stretched before us like the beginning of an
interminable waterway. In the offing the
sea and sky were welded together without a joint...” (1)
Thus, readers are immediately presented with a load of information that Conrad does not say outright, but that is implied through knowledge and preconceptions that we, as imaginative consumers, have of that era. This also brings into play the aspect of reader-response analysis. This reference to the sea, while likely to give a sense of anticipation to the audience, could also be taken in a foreboding manner. Perhaps to those with traumatizing experiences about the ocean or setting out on adventures, this image is more disturbing than appealing. To the anxious, a place without borders, walls, confinement, or rules, only brings a sense of dread and desire for safety.
However, after reading on into the story, it is evident that this could also be an accurate response to the rest of the book. The novel goes on to describe the frightening perils and prejudices common of that time, certainly not anything to make readers feel comfortable. BUT it also relates the riches and fame offered to those who return to their homeland victorious. Both of these viewpoints are valid and open to the interpretation of the individual.
To an Englishman in 1899, a scene of sitting onboard a ship headed for untamed land was likely either an oft-thought-of daydream or a reality, purely because of the importance and commonality of such excursions at the time. But whether it brought a sense of excitement or anxiety depended, as it does today, to unique, personal perspective.
For more info on the new historical analysis, check this out!
Also that picture was from one night of boredom in 8th grade. It is no longer accurate. Promise promise.
First of all, I love how your visual aid illustrates the idea of dual interpretation, and reminds us all of questionable eighth grade decisions. I think you used Heart of Darkness so well to explain the New Historicism theory. I love the idea that the waterways represented the people, which could symbolize consumerism and excitement, while many readers will respond with fear. I think you juxtaposed the literary theories well and helped me to look at the novel in a new way. It's amazing how much a background historical knowledge can enhance or just simply change the way we analyze a work, as opposed to when it stands on it's own.
ReplyDeleteI loved this sentence: "Thus, readers are immediately presented with a load of information that Conrad does not say outright, but that is implied through knowledge and preconceptions that we, as imaginative consumers, have of that era." I think it perfectly describes the experience of reading Heart of Darkness. Conrad/Marlow leaves a lot unsaid. It's in his tone sometimes, but, for the most part, the reader is left to interpret what he said based on what little knowledge we may have of the time. For example, in my first analysis I wrote about the "van" Marlow mentions. In our time, we picture a minivan that soccer mom's drive, but I had to actually look up what a van looked like back then. We interpret based on what we know. Loved your post!
ReplyDelete