We’ve already discussed Heart
of Darkness by Joseph Conrad quite a bit on this blog if you’ve been
following along with us. I am going to
keep expounding on that novel by looking at it in the context of “cultural
studies.” It was pretty hard for me to pinpoint exactly what I wanted to
discuss about cultural studies because I didn’t even know what it was to begin
with before I read from our textbook Literary
Theory and Criticism. Basically, as
defined by our textbook, “cultural studies investigates meaning in the social
text of everyday life.” “Culture” is a very broad definition. Some define culture as something that lots of
people participate in, and some define culture as something that is made up of
the “best” of society. I am going to be basing my analysis off of the following
passage from the text of the novel:
“Hunters for gold or pursuers of fame, they all had gone out
on that stream, bearing the sword, and often the torch, messengers of the might
within the land, bearers of a spark from the sacred fire. What greatness had
not floated on the ebb of that river into the mystery of an unknown earth!”
The passage above relates clearly to the many themes of
colonization that prevail throughout the novel.
Discussed in Literary Theory and
Criticism is a theory developed by F. R. Leavis and his wife. Leavis said that Joseph Conrad is one of the
most important writers for those of society to read. He said reading Conrad could help a society
“struggling against war, mechanization, commercialism, and the diminishing
impact of religion.” From the above
passage, we can interpret why Leavis chose Conrad as one of the most culturally
important authors to read. Conrad brings to light in Heart of Darkness the great sufferings of the people who lived in
the Congo at that time.
Also, from the Literary
and Theory Criticism book, I read about “enlightenment rationality
replacing myth.” Two prominent theorists
from the 1930s, Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer, said that the
Enlightenment Era, which began in the 1600s, was a cultural movement designed
to move people out of captivity. But,
because cultural practices became so ingrained in peoples’ minds, enlightenment
replaced “rational myth.”
We see so clearly throughout Heart of Darkness the people of the Congo being oppressed by the
“conquerors.” But, we don’t see people
too upset over the fact that people are starving and dying in the name of
enlightenment and civilization. Kurtz
uses Marlow’s character to break the cultural norms that generally accepted the
“ration myth” of enlightenment. We see
through Marlow’s eyes the horrors that actually happened in the Congo, and we
feel for the people there.
The two above theories relate in the sense that they both
comment on the
culture happening around and within Heart of Darkness. Themes of
oppression serve as a guide to comment on the “rational myth” that had replaced
theories of enlightenment. These same
themes of oppression also serve as a cultural guide of “what not to do.” After reading Literary Theory and Criticism, I have a better grasp on cultural
studies and how they apply to Conrad’s Heart
of Darkness.
I found a presentation that deals with enlightenment in Heart of Darkness. Click here to view.
My picture is a bit unrelated just as Nathan's is, but this is me and my fiancé!
|
No comments:
Post a Comment